How a children's hospital created a cancer-survivor splash courtyard in Charlotte, North Carolina
A composite case study of a pediatric oncology program building a post-treatment celebration splash pad for survivors, siblings, and families returning to ordinary play.
Summary
This composite Charlotte case follows a pediatric oncology center that built a $1.65 million splash courtyard next to its survivorship clinic and family resource center. Unlike an inpatient rehab pad, the space was designed for children finishing treatment, siblings, and caregivers relearning ordinary family play after months or years of clinical routine. Child-life, oncology rehab, and infection-prevention teams co-wrote the operating model, the hospital foundation funded the build through a survivorship campaign, and the site now hosts more than forty remission and treatment-completion celebrations a year while also functioning as a daily family respite amenity.
Key metrics
Background: the hospital had excellent cancer treatment and a weak way to mark what came after
The spark for this project was not a facilities master plan. It was a recurring complaint from families in survivorship clinic exit interviews. Children finished chemotherapy or rang the treatment bell after bone marrow transplant recovery, the care team applauded, photos happened in a corridor, and then families often headed directly to elevators, parking decks, and long drives home. For many parents that abrupt transition felt emotionally wrong. They had spent months in spaces defined by scans, blood counts, masks, and infusion schedules, yet the milestone of finishing treatment landed in the same hallways where the hardest days had occurred. Siblings felt the tension too. They had often been spectators to the ill child's medical life, not participants in a shared family ritual. Child-life specialists began arguing that survivorship needed a physical setting as much as a clinical pathway. The hospital already had a rooftop therapeutic garden, but it was quiet, passive, and better suited to reflection than celebration. What oncology families wanted was a place that felt safe, outdoors, and bodily expressive without requiring a full event-production mindset. Water play emerged as the most compelling answer because it symbolized ordinary childhood in a direct way. To run, splash, laugh, and get soaked after treatment carried a meaning that no plaque or photo backdrop could match. The question was whether a hospital could create that kind of joy without drifting into sentimentality or compromising medical caution.
The program rationale was about survivorship, re-entry, and sibling reintegration rather than acute-care therapy
This case differs sharply from the earlier generation of children's hospital therapeutic pads built for inpatient rehab. Survivors' Garden was intentionally outpatient-facing. The oncology service line wanted a bridge between treatment completion and normal family recreation, especially for children whose bodies had changed under treatment. Some had lost endurance, confidence, balance, or tolerance for outdoor activity. Others simply associated their hospital with procedures and wanted one memory from the campus that was not clinical. Pediatric rehab therapists supported the project because a splash court allowed low-stakes movement, balance challenges, and progressive reconditioning without turning every session into formal physical therapy. Child-life specialists supported it because it gave siblings a role in celebration rather than positioning them at the edge of adult emotion. Social workers supported it because survivorship is psychologically messy; families can feel relief, fear of recurrence, grief for lost time, and pressure to perform happiness all at once. A playful outdoor setting gave those emotions somewhere to breathe. Importantly, the oncology team established clear boundaries. The space was never marketed as a treatment modality for neutropenic or actively immunocompromised patients. It was for cleared survivors, siblings, and families in defined windows of safety. That clarity prevented the project from becoming a fuzzy feel-good amenity. It remained a survivorship infrastructure investment, aimed at helping children and caregivers practice ordinary life again with support close by.
Funding succeeded because donors understood the emotional gap immediately and wanted a visible survivorship gift
The $1.65 million budget came together faster than many hospital amenity projects because the story was emotionally precise and operationally credible. The hospital foundation launched a targeted survivorship campaign after a spring gala, not a broad family-experience bucket. That mattered. Donors could picture the exact moment the space would serve: a child completing treatment and moving from bell-ringing into family play. A pediatric oncology parents group seeded the effort with $210,000, including many gifts in the $500 to $5,000 range from families who had already been through the program. A regional childhood-cancer nonprofit added $300,000, a local contractor underwrote some site-prep work, and a family whose daughter finished leukemia treatment provided the lead gift through their donor-advised fund. The hospital covered no major construction debt because philanthropy carried the capital. Leadership still insisted on one discipline common in strong healthcare capital campaigns: operating ownership had to be solved before groundbreaking. Oncology, child life, and facilities split the annual $96,000 run-rate rather than leaving the foundation to improvise soft support year after year. That decision reassured trustees that the splash court would not open as a donor-funded emotional gesture and then become a budget orphan. The foundation also resisted intense pressure to turn the site into a naming contest. Donor recognition sits on a quiet gratitude wall near the family resource room, while the splash court itself keeps the survivor story at the center. That restraint protected the hospital from commercializing one of its most vulnerable family milestones.
Design choices favored gentle joy, privacy gradients, and celebratory rituals instead of spectacle
Every major design choice was filtered through one question: would this feel safe and meaningful to a child whose body and confidence might still be recovering? That led away from destination-aquatic theatrics and toward lower-pressure, ground-based, highly programmable features. There is no giant dumping bucket, no blaring soundtrack, and no visual chaos. The pad instead uses soft arcs, bubbler clusters, interactive rings, and a bell-activated sequence that families can trigger after a treatment-completion ceremony. When a child rings the oncology bell indoors, a staff member can activate a paired sequence outside that sends a short burst of water and light through the courtyard. It is celebratory without being public-address-system loud. The layout also includes privacy gradients. One edge of the court opens to the main family zone and group celebrations. Two smaller alcoves, screened by planting and low walls, allow quieter use for families who want to mark the moment without an audience. Shade is abundant because many survivors remain heat-sensitive, and the seating mix assumes grandparents, siblings, strollers, and wheelchairs are all part of the same visit. A mosaic wall made from survivor-designed tiles anchors the site without turning it into a shrine. That balance was crucial. Families did not want a grief monument. They wanted a place that acknowledged hard things while still granting permission to be playful, silly, and physically free.
Clinical guardrails are what made the space trustworthy to oncology staff and parents
Hospitals often love the emotional concept of outdoor family amenities until infection prevention, scheduling, and liability questions arrive. Survivors' Garden survived those questions because the rules were written before the concrete was poured. The court runs only for medically cleared users and their families, with child-life staff coordinating celebration blocks and open-access periods. During times of elevated community viral activity or hospital masking alerts, the operating schedule can narrow without shutting the space permanently. Water quality standards exceed ordinary park practice, with hospital-level logging, same-day response requirements, and frequent third-party testing built into the maintenance contract. Families are screened in plain language, not through humiliating gatekeeping. If a child is newly off treatment but still restricted from communal water environments, the care team explains that clearly and helps plan an alternate milestone activity. That sensitivity matters because survivorship is uneven. Not every family reaches the same physical freedom on the same day, and a celebration space can inadvertently sharpen exclusion if policies are clumsy. The hospital also trained staff on emotional safety. Some families want photos and cheering. Others want ten quiet minutes with immediate relatives and no audience. The court therefore operates more like a flexible family resource than like a drop-in public splash pad. Oncology teams trusted it because it respected the variability of post-treatment life rather than assuming every remission story resolves into a single happy scene.
Opening and year-one programming proved the site could support both milestone moments and ordinary Tuesdays
The first year mattered because the hospital needed to show that the court was more than a one-time capital campaign image. It opened with a family-only blessing and a small survivorship celebration, not a media-heavy ribbon-cut. From there the site settled into two modes. In milestone mode it hosted treatment-completion gatherings, survivorship camp reunions, and end-of-summer oncology-family evenings. Forty-one formal celebration events took place in the first twelve months, each small enough to remain personal. In daily mode the court welcomed families before or after survivorship clinic visits, siblings waiting during follow-up labs, and children returning to campus for scans who needed one positive association with the place before heading inside. That second mode turned out to be as important as the first. Staff learned quickly that ordinary use stabilized the meaning of the space. If the court only opened for ceremonies, it would feel precious and emotionally loaded. Because it also supported routine family time, it became easier for parents to say yes to using it. The hospital integrated the court into summer survivorship programming, adaptive fitness classes, and peer-family meetups without over-scheduling it. Attendance reached roughly 9,800 survivor-family visits in year one, strong enough to validate ongoing staffing but low enough that the site never felt crowded beyond its mission. The best compliment came from families who said the hospital finally contained one place where their child could act like a kid first and a patient second.
The measured impact was qualitative as much as quantitative, which is normal for survivorship infrastructure
No responsible hospital claimed that a splash courtyard improved survival curves or changed hard oncology outcomes. The benefits were more lived than clinical, but they were still measurable. Family-experience surveys showed strong gains in the question cluster related to treatment-completion support and survivorship transition. Child-life staff reported better sibling participation during celebration events because brothers and sisters had something concrete to do instead of standing beside adults holding phones. Pediatric rehab noted that some families who resisted formal conditioning appointments were more willing to engage in movement coaching when it happened in the splash court context. Social workers observed another subtle gain: parents returning for follow-up appointments often arrived less braced because they could anchor the visit around a positive family routine. The hospital also used the space to improve continuity with community life. Survivorship groups held back-to-school meetups there, and oncology nurses could talk practically about sun exposure, hydration, and returning to public play environments while children were already in motion. None of that fits neatly into a single ROI formula, but the combined effect was real. The court helped survivorship feel less like an administrative status and more like a supported phase of family life. In pediatric cancer care that shift matters. Finishing treatment is not the end of the story. Families still need places that let them rehearse normalcy with empathy and structure close at hand.
Replicability depends on survivorship volume, clinical discipline, and an honest tolerance for emotional complexity
Other pediatric cancer centers will look at this model and be tempted to copy the visible parts: the bell sequence, the tiles, the joyful fundraising story. The harder parts deserve at least equal attention. A survivorship splash court works best where outpatient oncology volume is large enough to justify dedicated programming and where child-life, infection prevention, oncology rehab, and facilities all have the authority to co-own operations. It is far less suitable as a general children's hospital amenity vaguely themed around courage. That usually dilutes the concept and confuses clinical guardrails. Hospitals also need emotional maturity about what the space represents. Not every family celebrates publicly. Some will relapse. Some children will die. A survivorship space has to be compatible with hope without denying those realities. That is why privacy gradients, flexible programming, and careful staff training matter so much. The Charlotte composite suggests that when a hospital handles those complexities well, a splash court can become one of the clearest physical expressions of survivorship support on campus. It gives children a controlled way to feel ordinary again and gives families a ritual that is active rather than merely commemorative. In the best version of the model, joy is not treated as decorative. It is treated as a real care outcome worth designing for.
Voices from the project
“Families kept telling us the bell moment was emotionally huge and logistically abrupt. They needed a place to go next, not just a hallway to leave through.”
“My son did not want another speech. He wanted to run through the water with his sister and feel normal for fifteen minutes.”
“The court works because it is medically disciplined and emotionally loose at the same time. It is not a contradiction if you design it carefully.”
Lessons learned
- Define the space around survivorship and post-treatment re-entry rather than around vague inspiration language.
- Write infection-prevention and medical-clearance rules before construction so oncology staff can trust the amenity.
- Use low-pressure programmable features and privacy gradients because not every family wants the same kind of celebration.
- Separate donor recognition from the main splash experience so the survivor moment does not feel commercialized.
- Keep the site active on ordinary clinic days; if it only opens for ceremonies, it becomes emotionally intimidating to use.
- Train staff on the uneven realities of survivorship, including relapse anxiety, fatigue, and sibling dynamics.
FAQ
How is a cancer-survivor splash pad different from a therapeutic hospital splash pad?
A survivor pad is primarily an outpatient celebration and family re-entry space for children finishing treatment, siblings, and follow-up families. It is not built mainly for inpatient rehab or bedside clinical therapy.
Is communal water play safe for pediatric cancer survivors?
It can be, but only with clear medical-clearance policies, elevated water-quality standards, and the ability to narrow access when infection-control conditions change. Newly immunocompromised patients are not appropriate users.
What makes the funding case work for hospitals?
Donors often respond strongly when the project answers a specific emotional gap in care. The strongest campaigns pair that emotional clarity with a solved operating plan so trustees know the space will remain credible after opening.
Related reports & data
Pair this case study with our original-data reports for citation and benchmarking.