How Asheville, North Carolina transformed a splash pad into a rotating summer arts festival venue
A composite arts-and-parks case study of an Asheville splash pad that became the centerpiece of a rotating summer arts festival, with multimedia performances and art installations integrated directly into the spray features across a twelve-week summer programming calendar.
Summary
An Asheville splash pad became the centerpiece of a $640,000 rotating summer arts festival featuring multimedia performances and temporary art installations integrated directly into the spray features across a twelve-week summer programming calendar. Funded jointly by the city parks department, a regional arts council, and a multi-year National Endowment for the Arts grant, the festival commissioned eight rotating artist residencies producing site-specific works ranging from projection-mapped water dance performances to interactive sound sculptures triggered by spray patterns. First-season attendance reached approximately 89,000 visits across festival programming hours plus standard pad operating hours, the festival drew artists from twenty-two states, and the model is now studied as a national reference for arts-and-parks programming integration that activates municipal water-feature infrastructure as performance venue.
Key metrics
Background: an arts city, a splash pad, and a programming gap
Asheville, North Carolina has long held a national reputation as a small-city arts capital, with a dense gallery and performance ecosystem, multiple summer arts festivals, and a tourism economy substantially driven by arts-and-culture programming. Pack Square Park, the city's central downtown park, had operated since 2009 with a conventional municipal splash pad that drew strong family-attendance during summer months but functioned as a recreational amenity unconnected to the city's broader arts identity. By 2024 city parks staff and the regional arts council had identified a programming gap: the pad's central downtown location, its existing water-feature infrastructure, and its strong evening-and-weekend attendance profile suggested untapped potential as an arts-programming venue, but no institutional pathway had ever connected pad operations to the city's arts-programming calendar. A 2024 cross-departmental planning conversation between parks staff, arts-council leadership, and a downtown-business-improvement district representative produced the festival-rotation concept: design a twelve-week summer programming calendar with rotating artist residencies producing site-specific works that integrated with the pad's spray features, performance schedules, and evening-illumination capacity.
Multimedia integration and the artist-commissioning process
The festival's distinctive feature is the integration of commissioned artist works directly into the pad's spray features rather than as adjacent installations. The eight rotating artist residencies — each running approximately six to ten days during the twelve-week season — produce site-specific works ranging across multiple media. Projection-mapped water-dance performances use the pad's spray patterns as projection surfaces during evening hours, with custom mapping software calibrated to the pad's specific feature geometry. Interactive sound sculptures place contact microphones and ambient sensors in proximity to spray features, with sound generation triggered by spray patterns and visitor proximity. Kinetic light installations integrate with the pad's existing LED lighting infrastructure during evening operations. Performance-art residencies use the pad's surface as performance ground for choreographed water-and-movement pieces. Each residency is preceded by a six-week technical-integration period during which the artist works with the parks department's mechanical staff and a contracted aquatic-engineering firm to ensure the proposed work operates safely within the pad's operating parameters. The commissioning process draws applications from a national open call, with selection by a panel that includes parks staff, arts-council leadership, and rotating artist-jury members.
Funding stack and the NEA multi-year grant pathway
The $640,000 festival programming budget came from a three-source funding stack reflecting the project's hybrid arts-and-parks character. The largest contribution, $310,000, came through a three-year National Endowment for the Arts Our Town grant supporting creative-placemaking initiatives that connect arts programming to civic infrastructure. A second $200,000 came from the regional arts council operating budget, allocated as a three-year programmatic commitment with renewal contingent on first-cycle outcomes. The remaining $130,000 came from the city parks department's programming budget, supplemented by a downtown-business-improvement-district contribution recognizing the festival's downtown-economic-activity benefits. The funding mix navigated the project's distinctive arts-and-parks character cleanly, with NEA funds applied to artist residencies and creative-placemaking programming, arts-council funds supporting performance-event production, and parks-department funds covering pad-operations supplementation during festival hours. The NEA Our Town pathway has emerged as one of the project's most-replicable funding lessons, with several other arts-active small cities now exploring analogous applications for similar splash-pad-arts-programming integration.
Performance scheduling and the standard-operations balance
Festival programming runs alongside standard pad operations rather than displacing them, an operational structure that required careful scheduling design across the twelve-week season. The pad operates as a conventional family-recreation amenity during morning and early-afternoon hours throughout the season. Festival programming runs primarily during late-afternoon and evening hours (typically 5pm to 10pm) on Thursday through Sunday, with the pad's spray features cycling between standard recreational operation and artist-residency configurations across the programming calendar. The scheduling design produced both substantially expanded total operating hours and clearly differentiated programming windows, with families using the pad during conventional hours and arts-programming audiences attending performances during evening windows. The dual-audience structure has produced unusually strong combined attendance — conventional pad-attendance metrics held steady year-over-year despite the programming additions, while festival-programming attendance added approximately 31,000 incremental evening visits. The scheduling design has been cited as the project's most-replicable operational lesson and is now being adapted by several other arts-and-parks programming initiatives nationally.
Artist-experience outcomes and the national-residency pipeline
The artist-residency component has produced unusually strong artist-experience outcomes that have positioned the festival as a meaningful creative-placemaking program in the national arts-residency landscape. Artist applications across the first season exceeded 340 from twenty-two states, with the selection panel awarding eight residencies across a competitive process that produced an artist cohort spanning multiple disciplines (projection mapping, interactive sound, kinetic light, performance art). Resident artists reported substantial creative-development outcomes, with several producing works that subsequently traveled to other arts-programming venues nationally. The residency stipends — averaging $14,000 per artist plus travel and materials support — were positioned competitively within the national arts-residency landscape and supported the program's recruitment-pipeline objectives. The program has been featured in several national arts-publications including Americans for the Arts and Public Art Review, and the city has begun receiving inquiries from peer cities about technical-integration consulting for analogous programs. The artist-experience strength has also produced reputational benefits for Asheville's broader arts-economy positioning and is now cited in the city's tourism-promotion materials.
Replicability across arts-active small and mid-size cities
The Pack Square Park festival model is replicable across arts-active small and mid-size cities with sufficient existing splash-pad infrastructure, arts-council institutional capacity, and parks-department willingness to coordinate cross-departmental programming. Several conditions affect replication success. First, the pad infrastructure must be sufficiently flexible to accommodate technical-integration requirements — older or simpler pads may lack the LED-lighting, electrical-capacity, or feature-controllability required for multimedia integration. Second, arts-council institutional capacity to administer artist-residency programs is essential — this typically requires at minimum a half-time arts-administrator role dedicated to the festival cycle. Third, NEA Our Town grant access requires established creative-placemaking institutional capacity and competitive narrative positioning. Fourth, the city's broader arts-programming context must be sufficiently strong to support audience development for evening-arts programming. Fifth, parks-department willingness to share operational control across the festival calendar requires explicit cross-departmental memoranda-of-understanding. Where these conditions converge, the arts-festival-rotation pattern produces unusually strong combined arts-programming and parks-utilization outcomes, and several arts-active small cities (Burlington Vermont, Santa Fe New Mexico, Athens Georgia) are in early stages of analogous planning processes citing the Asheville composite as their primary precedent.
Voices from the project
“I came to Asheville for a six-day residency and produced a projection-mapped water-dance piece that I have now performed at three other venues. The technical-integration support from the parks staff was unlike any arts-residency I have done. They treated the pad's spray features as a serious performance medium.”
“We held conventional pad attendance steady while adding 31,000 evening-arts-programming visits. The dual-audience structure works because we scheduled the programming windows cleanly. Families come during the day, arts audiences come at night, and the pad serves both communities without compromising either.”
“The NEA Our Town grant pathway is exactly designed for projects like this — arts programming connected to civic infrastructure that produces creative-placemaking outcomes. Asheville's application was strong because it positioned the pad as a performance medium, not just a programming venue.”
Lessons learned
- Treat splash-pad spray features as a serious performance medium rather than as backdrop — the integration is the project's signature creative-placemaking innovation.
- Schedule festival programming during evening hours alongside standard daytime pad operations to support dual-audience use without operational compromise to either.
- Apply for NEA Our Town creative-placemaking grants as the foundational funding pathway — the institutional fit is unusually strong for arts-and-parks integration projects.
- Build a six-week technical-integration period into each artist residency to ensure proposed works operate safely within the pad's mechanical and aquatic-engineering parameters.
- Position artist-residency stipends competitively within the national arts-residency landscape (typically $12,000-$16,000 plus travel and materials) to recruit a strong applicant pool.
- Coordinate cross-departmental memoranda-of-understanding between parks and arts-council institutions early in project development — operational-control sharing requires explicit framework.
- Track both conventional pad-attendance metrics and incremental festival-programming attendance separately to demonstrate dual-audience outcomes to funders and stakeholders.
FAQ
How do projection-mapped water-dance performances actually work on a splash pad?
Custom mapping software is calibrated to the pad's specific feature geometry, with projection equipment positioned to use the spray patterns as projection surfaces during evening hours. The artist's choreographed visual content is timed to the pad's feature-cycling controls, producing synchronized projections across moving water surfaces. The technical integration requires a six-week setup period and close coordination with the parks department's mechanical staff.
Does festival programming compromise the pad's family-recreation function?
Not when scheduled cleanly. Festival programming runs primarily during late-afternoon and evening hours (5pm to 10pm Thursday through Sunday), with the pad operating as a conventional family-recreation amenity during morning and early-afternoon hours throughout the season. Conventional pad-attendance metrics held steady year-over-year despite programming additions, demonstrating dual-audience compatibility.
What pad infrastructure is required to support arts-festival programming?
Sufficient flexibility for technical integration including LED-lighting infrastructure, adequate electrical capacity for performance equipment, and feature-controllability supporting cycling between recreational and artist-residency configurations. Older or simpler pads may lack these capabilities. Most pads built after 2015 with modern controls and lighting systems can typically support the integration with modest supplementary investment.
Related reports & data
Pair this case study with our original-data reports for citation and benchmarking.