How does SplashPadHub decide whether to include HOA, apartment, or resort splash pads?

Not every splash pad belongs in the same kind of directory view. A resident-only HOA sprayground, apartment amenity deck, or hotel kids' zone may be real and useful, but it is not equivalent to a municipal public pad. SplashPadHub therefore treats access restriction as a first-order editorial fact, not a side note. Publicly accessible and straightforwardly bookable facilities are the default focus. Restricted-access amenities may still appear in some contexts if they are notable, regionally important, or relevant to a traveler audience, but the access rules need to be explicit. We do not want families driving to a place that exists yet is closed to them by design. Inclusion is less about prestige and more about user expectation: can a normal reader reasonably use this place, and will the listing make that answer clear enough to prevent wasted effort?